Monday, February 08, 2010

Suffrage

At the risk of playing with words whose connotations I don't fully understand... Eclipse committers have to suffer - a little bit - to be enfranchised. I mean, to get the right to vote in the 2010 Eclipse board member elections, which begin two weeks from today, on February 22, 2010.

If you are an individual (not employed by a member company) committer: Please click here, and sign and send the membership agreement to the Eclipse Foundation. This will enable you to vote in the upcoming board member elections. There is no cost, and as an added bonus, the Eclipse Foundation is now sending really nice thank-you e-mails to those individual committers who become members.

Why should you do that? Let me try to explain with a diagram:


(thanks, diagrammr!)

Here is the same information in text form, copied from the election process web page:
  • Each Committer Member gets one vote. Note that committers who are employees of Member companies have all the rights and privileges (including voting) of a Committer Member.
  • Individual committers must join the Eclipse Foundation as Committer Members by signing the Membership Agreement in order to be allowed to vote.
  • All committers who are employees of a single company have their votes collapsed into a single vote in the committer elections.
That's right: every vote from an individual committer member (someone who signed the individual membership agreement) is worth exactly the same as the votes from all EclipseSource committers combined, or all Oracle committers combined, or all itemis committers combined, ... you get the idea.

That seems a little bit weird, but it sort of makes sense considering the situation back when the rules were made: IBM had way more Eclipse committers than everybody else, and there was a risk that they would determine the committer representatives, who then could be seen as voting in favour of IBM - leading to an imbalance at the board of directors. So when you think about it, the rules ensure that the committer representatives election is truly independent of any potential company interests.

So, to repeat, if you are an individual (not employed by a member company) committer: Please click here, and sign and send the membership agreement to the Eclipse Foundation. It's free (of charge), it will enable you to vote in the upcoming board member elections, and as an added bonus, the Eclipse Foundation is now sending really nice thank-you e-mails to those individual committers who become members.

More votes mean more weight for the committer representatives on the Eclipse Board of Directors. And if you are an individual committer, your vote weighs a lot!

Word definitions.
Suffrage (from the Latin suffragium, meaning "voting tablet", and figuratively "right to vote", and originally a term for the pastern bone used to cast votes) is the civil right to vote, or the exercise of that right.
...
Where
Universal suffrage exists, the right to vote is not restricted by race, gender, belief, wealth or social status. It typically does not extend a right to vote to all residents of a region; distinctions are frequently made in regard to citizenship, age, and occasionally mental capacity or criminal convictions.


4 comments:

Kim Moir said...

Any chance that the board would consider changing the voting rules so that they are one committer one vote? My understanding is that there are more individual committers now than from a single company. It seems like time for a change. I feel rather disenfranchised that my vote is worth so little. Also, since all the committer reps up for election are from different companies, there isn't the danger a single company controlling the board.

Scott K. said...

Boris, this likely isn't part of your cultural literacy, but my daughter just watched this over the weekend. See this YouTube video from Schoolhouse Rock.

Chris Aniszczyk (zx) said...

Great post Boris. It would be great if we could distill this message and send it to eclipse.org-committers

Ed Merks said...

I agree with Kim. I suggested it should be changed, but it's part of the by-laws and I believe changing it would require a vote with 2/3 majority.